A single Game has infinite complexities: twenty-four personalities crash together, tides against the sand, until only one remains. The arena itself is fraught with the unknown, where an eclipse could give way to a blood moon. Yet there exists patterns in movements, actions, decisions, that only the most discerning can decipher and judge. For the rest of us, contention remains:
Who won Panem's favor?
Who deserved to, but was left out of the limelight?
Whose promises proved underwhelming?
The answers would be left to churn at dinner parties, cocktail hours, and family gatherings. Until now: meet DALGAARD, The Hunger Games Museum's very own Resident Analyst and Ranking System. Our algorithm watched Game after Game, integrating information from each tribute into its very being. DALGAARD understands motivation better than a therapist, and physics as complex as the stars in the skies. It fills in the gaps and knows what makes a fascinating tribute, as well as what causes one to fall into the cracks.
DALGAARD uses four key metrics to determine where a tribute's legacy lies:
| Placement | Death Day | Training Score | Number of Kills |
From here, we determine a z-score, rank, and percentile for every tribute since the 54th games. See where your favorite tribute lies, or what tributes you may have overlooked before. Even create analyses of your own, and use it to facillitate your tour through the museum! Our sortable master-list can be found below, but you should feel free to look through our dataset.
Thank you, may the odds be ever in your favor!
| Rank | % | Name | District | Games Num. | Member | Placement | Death Day | Training Score | Num. Kills | Z-Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| {{ t.rank }} | {{ t.percentile }} | {{ t.name }} | {{ t.district | uppercase}} | {{ t.gameNum | ordinal }} | {{ t.member }} | {{ t.placement }} | {{ t.deathDay }} | {{ t.tScore }} | {{ t.kills }} | {{ t.zscore }} |